Country Name vs Trademark: Mexico. com
| Autor | WIPO - UDRP |
| Páginas | 172-186 |
R
R
Re
e
ev
v
vi
i
is
s
st
t
ta
a
a
L
L
La
a
at
t
ti
i
in
n
no
o
oa
a
am
m
me
e
er
r
ri
i
ic
c
ca
a
an
n
na
a
a
d
d
de
e
e
M
M
Me
e
ed
d
di
i
ia
a
ac
c
ci
i
ió
ó
ón
n
n
y
y
y
A
A
Ar
r
rb
b
bi
i
it
t
tr
r
ra
a
aj
j
je
e
e,
,
,
2
2
20
0
00
0
04
4
4,
,
,
N
N
Nú
ú
úm
m
me
e
er
r
ro
o
o
1
1
1
172
Country Name vs Trademark: Mexico. com
WIPO - UDRP
Consejo de Promoción Turística de México, S.A. de C.V. v.
Latin America Telecom Inc.
Case No. D2004-0242
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Consejo de Promoción Turística de México, S.A. de C.V., Colonia
Anzures, Mexico, represented by Bello, Guzmán, Morales Y Tsuru, S.C., Mexico.
The Respondent is Latin America Telecom Inc., Pittsburgh, PA Pennsylvania,
United States of America, represented by ESQwire.com Law Firm, United States of
America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Register.com.
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was filed in the Spanish language with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation
Center (the “Center”) on March 30, 2004. On April 6, 2004, the Center transmitted by email
to Register.com a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain
name. On April 6, 2004, Register.com transmitted by email to the Center its verification
response confirming that the Respondent is listed as the registrant; providing the contact
details for the administrative, billing, and technical contact and stating that the language used
at the time of registration was English. The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the
formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”),
the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO
Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the
“Supplemental Rules”).
In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2(a) and 4(a), the Center formally notified the
Respondent of the Complaint and the proceedings commenced on April 6, 2004. In response
to objections from the Respondent regarding the language of the proceedings, the Center
asked the Complainant to translate the Complaint into English. An English language
Complaint was filed with the Center on April 30, 2004, and the Center extended the due date
for the Response to May 20, 2004. The Response was filed in the English language with the
Center on May 21, 2004.
The Center appointed Alan L. Limbury, Manuel Moreno-Torres and David E. Sorkin as
panelists in this matter on June 21, 2004. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted.
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba