Nuevos horizontes de la justiciabilidad de los derechos sociales contra el legislador. La coacción indirecta
Autor | Giovanni Bisogni |
Cargo | Universidad de Salerno, Italia gbisogni@unisa.it |
Páginas | 61-82 |
61
IURIS TANTUM No. 30 https://doi.org/10.36105/iut.2019n30.05 2019
https://doi.org/10.36105/iut.2019n30.05
NUEVOS HORIZONTES DE LA JUSTICIABILIDAD DE
LOS DERECHOS SOCIALES CONTRA EL LEGISLADOR.
LA COACCIÓN INDIRECTA
NEW HORIZONS OF THE JUSTICIABILITY OF SOCIAL
RIGHTS AGAINST THE LEGISLATOR.
INDIRECT COACTION
RESUMEN:
Palabras clave:
ABSTRACT:
The article aims to present legal theoretical arguments in favour of the judicial
protection of social rights (the s.c. justiciability) in cases of legislative ‘omissio-
conceptual reasons as to why legislative violations of these social rights can be
62
IURIS TANTUM No. 30 https://doi.org/10.36105/iut.2019n30.05 2019
only partially controlled by judges. The second step will deal with the most common
arguments against the justiciability of social rights and, in particular, on a certain
conception of separation of powers, according to which judges’ subjecting to scru-
tiny social rights would take on legislative powers. Through a deep critique of this
to suggest concrete judicial remedies for the protection of social rights without
transforming judges in political organs of collective decisions (legislative-like).
Keywords:
Theory of Law, social rights, justiciability, separation of powers.
1
2
3
1
2Principia iuris. Teoria del diritto e della democrazia. I. Teoria del diritto
3
Courts and the Legal Enforcement of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Compa-
rative experiences of justiciability
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba